ArticlePloS one2026
Age differences in the conceptualization and experience of curiosity: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the recent resurgence in research on human curiosity and its influence on knowledge acquisition, there is little consensus on how to operationalize curiosity. Understanding lay beliefs on what curiosity is-and how it is experienced-is therefore an important avenue of study. Furthermore, given age-related shifts in emotional processing and goal-seeking, definitions and experiences of curiosity may fluctuate over the lifespan. Here, we used qualitative techniques to characterize perceptions of curiosity in younger and older adults. We found that while both younger and older adults described curiosity as a form of joyous exploration, younger participants more commonly highlighted the link between curiosity and feelings of deprivation, thrill-seeking, and centrality to being human. Older adults, however, more frequently referenced the social aspects of curiosity, and interestingly, approximately 50% of all participants' responses were categorized as miscellaneous, suggesting that current multidimensional frameworks of curiosity may not completely align with lay conceptualizations. Older adults were also more likely than younger adults to describe curiosity as a positive trait, indicative of one's sincerity. In contrast, younger adults more frequently described curiosity as a trait linked to novelty-seeking and personal growth, but that it should be expressed in moderation, likely because of its potentially harmful consequences (e.g., invading others' privacy). Overall, we show that conceptualizations and experiences of curiosity vary between younger and older adults-an important empirical contribution given the trait's ubiquity across the lifespan and its role in promoting opportunities for lifelong learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.