ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2026
Animal models relevant to digital technology-based disorders.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models utilizing Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning paradigms have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying drug addiction and certain behavioral addiction such as gambling disorder, but so far there is no animal model for digital technology-based disorders such as (Internet) gaming disorder, which is an emerging issue in our digital society. Casile et al. (2025) introduced a rat touchscreen paradigm recapitulating several key phenotypes relevant to gaming disorder, including preoccupation with the touchscreen and behavioral persistence despite non-reinforcement. However, the paradigm's reliance on food reinforcers limits translational relevance. We suggest integrating Casile et al. touchscreen paradigm with non-food operant paradigms (e.g., light self-administration), to dissociate any intrinsic reinforcing effects of touchscreen interaction and response-contingent sensory feedback from hedonic values of food. Potential differences in sensory habituation between rats and mice highlight the need for cross-species comparisons, to distinguish species-specific responses from general behavioral mechanisms in non-human animals and humans. While animal models cannot fully capture the multifaceted nature of digital technology-based disorders, they provide simplified models to examine how behavioral persistence can be shaped and maintained by non-food, non-drug reinforcement contingencies without the influence of cultural and social factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.