ArticleJAMA network open2026
Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Patients With Low-Risk Cystic Lesions.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Low-risk pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) represent common incidental findings with potential for malignant transformation, warranting long-term surveillance. However, data on their long-term cancer risk are limited, leading to inconsistency in current surveillance strategies. Objective: To determine the long-term incidence of pancreatic cancer among patients with low-risk PCLs, and to identify baseline clinical and imaging factors associated with cancer development. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted among adults (aged ≥18 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2021, at a large, multisite health care system in Massachusetts. MRI or CT scans were screened for PCLs without high-risk stigmata, worrisome features, or coexisting pancreatic mass. Eligible patients with low-risk PCLs were longitudinally followed up. Data analysis was performed from February 2024 to May 2025. Exposures: Baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics of patients with low-risk PCLs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was incidence of pancreatic cancer (defined as pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, invasive mucinous neoplasms, or high-grade dysplasia). Censoring was defined as absence of pancreatic cancer on imaging follow-up for more than 1 year after the initial examination documenting the PCL. Multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed the associations between baseline factors and incident pancreatic cancer, accounting for death as a competing risk. Associations were reported as hazard ratios (HRs). Risk stratification performance was assessed using Harrell C-statistic and net reclassification index (NRI). Results: Among 499 631 patients reviewed, 6064 with low-risk PCLs were identified and included in the analytic sample, contributing 20 145 person-years of follow-up. Patients had a mean (SD) age at diagnosis of 65.9 (12.3) years and included 3612 females (59.6%). Of the 6064 patients, 38 (0.6%) developed pancreatic cancer, with an incidence rate of 1.89 (95% CI, 1.29-2.49) cases per 1000 person-years, which was higher than the previously reported general population rate of 0.14 cases per 1000 person-years. Twenty-six of 38 patients (68.4%) had cancer that arose from the cyst site, while 12 (31.6%) developed cancer from a different region of the pancreas. Ten patients (26.3%) were diagnosed more than 5 years after initial PCL detection. In multivariable analysis, larger cyst size (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.45-3.48), main pancreatic duct ectasia (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.18-6.84), and older age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) were associated with cancer. Adding age to a cyst size-based risk stratification model improved estimation of pancreatic cancer risk (NRI, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.03-0.37]; change in C-statistic, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07-0.22]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that low-risk PCLs were associated with a sustained long-term pancreatic cancer risk and were best stratified by combining clinical and imaging factors. Longer than a 5-year follow-up of low-risk PCLs may be warranted to reduce missed or delayed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.