ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Outcomes of Venous-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thrombosis: focus on molecular mechanisms, biomarkers and cardio-oncology.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outcomes of venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy in acute pulmonary embolism. High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has a high mortality risk. VA-ECMO provides essential cardiopulmonary support, although data outcomes remain limited. We sought to describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients supported with VA-ECMO for the management of high-risk PE. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of adult patients treated with VA-ECMO for high-risk PE at the University of Minnesota between January 2015 and May 2024. High-risk PE was defined by the European Society of Cardiology criteria. Clinical, demographic, procedural, and outcome data were analyzed. Mortality predictors were assessed using logistic regression. Of 1350 patients supported by VA-ECMO, 58 (4.3%) presented with high-risk PE (69% cardiac arrest, 31% shock). Mortality was significantly higher among patients cannulated for cardiac arrest than for shock (72.5% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.005). An independent predictor of mortality was out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.15-38.7, P = 0.035). The duration of CPR was shorter among survivors (25.9 vs. 44.2 min, P = 0.02). Neither catheter-directed therapy nor systemic thrombolysis was associated with survival. Major bleeding occurred in 67% of patients and was not significantly associated with mortality. Neurologic injury was the leading cause of death in cardiac arrest patients; multiorgan failure predominated in the shock group. Despite the use of VA-ECMO, mortality in high-risk PE remains elevated, but differed by indication for cannulation. Survival was higher in patients presenting with shock, in-hospital cardiac arrest, shorter CPR duration, and sustained return of spontaneous circulation. Further research is needed to define the role of VA-ECMO and adjunctive therapies across varied clinical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.