ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
The applicability of the 21-gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in lymph node positive hormone receptor positive male breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Male breast cancer: from extrapolated practice to evidence-based care.The oncologist · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur study aimed to determine if chemotherapy administration based on the 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in men with hormone receptor positive (HR+) Her2 negative (Her2-) lymph node positive(LN+) breast cancers (BC) impacted overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult men and women with HR+ Her2-, 1-3 axillary LN + BC, with a valid oncotype DX RS assay, diagnosed between the years 2004-2020, using the National Cancer Database. RS risk categories were defined as low risk: 0-13, intermediate risk:14-25, and high risk: ≥26.
resultsOf the 77,820 patients included in the study, 900 (1.2%) were male and 76,920 (98.8%) were female. Higher RS (both as a continuous and categorical variable) was significantly associated with worse OS in males (p = 0.003 continuous, p = 0.006 categorical), females ≤ 50 years old and females > 50 years old (p < 0.001 both continuous and categorical, in both groups). In the stratified adjusted models, there was no association between receipt of chemotherapy and OS in males for all RS risk groups. Conversely, chemotherapy improved OS for women ≤ 50 and for women > 50 who belonged to the intermediate and high RS risk groups (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively (women ≤ 50); p = 0.005 and p < 0·001 respectively (women > 50)).
conclusionRS as determined by the Oncotype DX assay is associated with OS in men and women with HR+ Her2- LN+ BC. However, RS is not an indicator of the benefit of chemotherapy on OS in men, in contrast to women, with HR+ Her2- LN+ BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.