ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
Large language models and large multimodal models in radiology: opportunities, challenges, and the path toward sustainable long-term clinical integration.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs), built on transformer architecture, have emerged as a fundamental tool in natural language processing and contextual reasoning, and have been extended to multimodal data interpretation, which has been termed large multimodal models (LMMs). Radiology as a medical discipline, having undergone full digital transformation over the past two decades, is uniquely positioned at the forefront of medicine to benefit from this recent technological advancement. The integration of LLMs and LMMs into radiology workflows has demonstrated promise in improving reporting efficiency, decision support, and clinical communication. However, real-world adoption remains limited due to concerns about reliability, hallucinations, drift, workflow disruption, medicolegal uncertainty, and the absence of standardized integration to existing clinical systems/infrastructures. This review highlights the need for transparent model behavior, standardized software integration tools, and high-quality radiologist-curated local datasets. While early studies suggest that LLMs and LMMs may reduce cognitive load and enhance reporting efficiency, their clinical value depends on alignment with radiologists' needs, well-planned deployment, and rigorous evaluation and maintenance. We conclude with suggestions toward effective integration of LLMs and LMMs into modern, constantly evolving radiology practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42159910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.