ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to assess the current state of bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) management in the adolescent and young adult population (AYA) with a focus on Ewing sarcoma (EWS), osteosarcoma (OS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). RECENT
findingsThere has been a significant growth in novel agents available for bone sarcomas in the AYA population; trials continue to study the efficacy of these agents. The future of STS will likely include more single histology and targeted biologic studies. Joint pediatric and adult sarcoma clinical trials are feasible. AYAs continue to represent an underserved patient population in medical oncology. Collaboration between pediatric and adult practices may increase patient enrollment and enable single histology and biology specific studies. Trials for EWS, OS, RMS, and NRSTS should include both pediatric and adult patients whenever possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.