Observational studyMaternal and child health journal2026
Extracting Signs and Symptoms of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy from Clinical Notes Using Natural Language Processing.
Observational study in Maternal and child health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) affect 16% of births in the United States. In this pilot study, we conducted a preliminary evaluation of natural language processing (NLP) in extracting signs and symptoms (SS) of HDP from clinical notes within electronic health records (EHRs).
methodsThis retrospective observational pilot study used EHR data from patients admitted for labor and birth (N = 83,003 clinical notes from 17,775 patients). Four SS categories were extracted: elevated blood pressure, neurological, renal, and hepatic/hematologic. Five machine learning models and ClinicalBERT were trained and tested using five-fold cross-validation. The best-performing model was applied to the full dataset. Bivariate analyses were performed to examine (1) differences in HDP diagnoses based on ICD-10 codes (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia) by SS documentation and (2) differences in SS documentation by patient race and ethnicity.
resultsXGBoost demonstrated the highest macro-average F1-score (0.75). Elevated blood pressure showed the highest F1-score (0.87), followed by neurological SS (0.77). In the full dataset, 24.3% of clinical notes and 42.3% of patients had documentation of at least one SS category. A higher proportion of HDP diagnoses was observed with an increased number of SS categories documented (p < .001). A higher proportion of non-Hispanic Black patients had documentation of SS across all categories.
conclusionNLP can extract SS with moderate accuracy, supporting feasibility for larger-scale extraction. Findings also highlight differences in SS documentation by patient race and ethnicity. Future research is needed to improve NLP performance, including expanding annotated data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.