Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Performance of PRISM III and pediatric early warning score for predicting patients needing increased level of care in a pediatric intermediate care unit.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of PRISM III and pediatric early warning score (PEWS) for predicting increased level of care in an intermediate care unit (IMCU) and to describe the factors associated with it. This was a retrospective observational study in an IMCU of a tertiary university hospital without an on-site pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Patients younger than 14 years old admitted to IMCU (June 2021 to September 2024) were included. Area under the curve (AUC) for "increased level of care"-composite outcome including high respiratory support, invasive procedures, prolonged length of stay, or PICU-transfer-was calculated for both scores. Of 567 patients included (median age 15 months [IQR 3-49]; 57.8% male), 269 (47.4%) needed increased level of care. AUC of PRISM III was 0.545 (CI95% 0.497-0.592), whereas AUC of PEWS was 0.697 (CI95% 0.654-0.740); sensitivity was 43.5% (CI95% 37.8-49.3) and specificity was 86.6% (CI95% 82.3-90.1). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses. Healthcare workers or family concern was associated with increased level of care [aOR 4.127 (CI95% 2.492-6.835)] and PICU-transfer [aOR 8.180 (CI95% 2.920-22.912)].
conclusionsNeither PRISM III nor PEWS was accurate to predict increased level of care in IMCU. Healthcare worker or family concern was associated with both increased level of care and PICU-transfer. These findings highlight the need for IMCU-specific severity tools and the importance of individual assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Early warning scores (PEWS) and PRISM III are widely used in general wards and PICU, respectively. • However, their performance in intermediate care units (IMCU) remains poorly defined. WHAT IS NEW: • Both PRISM III and PEWS have limited accuracy in predicting the need for increased level of care within an IMCU. • The subjective concern of staff or family members was associated with clinical worsening and PICU-transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42159847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.