Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159824›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Some carcass and meat quality characteristics of Anatolian local and Mast geese in semi-intensive conditions.

Hasan Ürer, İskender Yıldırım, Gamze Asker, Günnur Peşmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hasan ÜrerMucur Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Kırşehir, Türkiye.
İskender YıldırımDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.
Gamze AskerDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.
Günnur PeşmenDepartment of Laboratory and Veterinary Health, Suhut Vocational School, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye. gnnr1903@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-6629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, meat quality characteristics of Anatolian local geese (Anser anser domesticus) and Mast geese (Anser anser) reared under semi-intensive conditions were compared. A total of 100 geese were used: 50 from each breed, 25 males and 25 females, aged 16-18 weeks. No statistically significant difference was found between the two breeds in terms of live weight (LW) and cold carcass weight (CW) (P > 0.05). However, it was determined that males in both breeds had higher live weight and cold carcass weight than females (P < 0.05). Liver weight of Mast geese (71.81 g) was significantly higher than that of Anatolian local geese (32.91 g) (P < 0.05). In color analysis, the b* value (yellowness) of Anatolian local geese minced meat was higher than that of Mast geese (P < 0.05). For breast meat, Mast geese had a higher a* value (redness), while Anatolian local geese had a higher b* value (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between breeds in terms of chemical composition (dry matter, moisture, protein, fat, ash) and physicochemical traits (pH, water holding capacity, cooking loss, and penetrometer values) (P > 0.05).

Indexed as

GeeseMeatAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBody WeightFemaleMaleTurkeyCarcass characteristicsColor parametersGoose meatMeat quality

Identifiers

PMID42159824
PMCPMC13190801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.