ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Treatment patterns and outcomes in high-risk WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal adjuvant alkylating chemotherapy regimen for high-risk WHO grade 2 glioma in the molecular era remains uncertain. We evaluated real-world treatment patterns, toxicity, and outcomes following radiotherapy with adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) or procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) in a multicentre Canadian cohort.
methodsPROTECT is a retrospective multicentre cohort study including adults with clinically defined high-risk WHO grade 2 diffuse glioma treated with radiotherapy and adjuvant alkylating chemotherapy. Clinical, molecular, treatment delivery, toxicity, surveillance, and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression.
resultsA total of 116 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 71 months. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was present in 84.6% of evaluable cases, and 1p/19q codeletion in 56.6% of tested tumours. Median OS was not reached, with estimated 3- and 5-year OS rates of 97.3% and 94.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.4 years, with 3- and 5-year PFS rates of 83.6% and 77.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, IDH status was the only independent predictor of PFS (HR = 3.54, 95% CI 1.12-11.15; p = 0.03). Among patients with IDH-mutant tumours, PFS did not differ significantly between TMZ and PCV, including in analyses stratified by 1p/19q status. PCV was associated with higher rates of dose modification, treatment delays, and hematologic toxicity.
conclusionIn high-risk WHO grade 2 glioma, outcomes were favorable with radiotherapy and adjuvant alkylating chemotherapies, with greater toxicity associated with PCV compared to TMZ. IDH mutational status emerged as the dominant prognostic factor. Prospective, molecularly stratified trials are necessary to characterize comparative effectiveness of regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42159820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.