Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159807›Full record

ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026

Microbial co-inoculation and extracellular vesicles: new frontiers for soybean productivity.

Fernando Sintra Fulaneti, Edgar Salis Brasil-Neto, Vítor Sauzem Rumpel, Laís de Paula Ribeiro, Lucas Nascimento Brum, Lucas Pedro Cipriani, Thomas Newton Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fernando Sintra FulanetiDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-7873
Edgar Salis Brasil-NetoDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6568-5325
Vítor Sauzem RumpelDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8554-2471
Laís de Paula RibeiroDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0839-5563
Lucas Nascimento BrumDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2225-825X
Lucas Pedro CiprianiDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7245-7653
Thomas Newton MartinDepartment of Crop Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil. martin.ufsm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-3980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decades, the intensive use of chemical fertilizers in agriculture has shown low efficiency while causing serious environmental issues and leading to soil nutrient imbalances. These challenges are compounded by climate change, increasing incidence of diseases and pests, and soil acidification, factors that jeopardize agricultural productivity and, consequently, threaten global food security. Soybean (Glycine max L.) is one of the world's most important crops, serving as a key source of protein and oil for both human consumption and animal feed. Its global relevance continues to grow with rising demand for food, biofuels, and industrial applications, with Brazil, the United States, and Argentina leading production. Beyond its economic value, soybean contributes to agricultural sustainability through symbiotic nitrogen fixation, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers. However, maintaining high yields under changing environmental conditions requires innovative management strategies. In this context, one promising strategy to mitigate these problems is the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), which contribute to more sustainable crop yield. Although numerous studies are underway regarding the potential of PGPB, further research is still necessary due to the limited understanding of their mechanisms of action and the vast range of benefits they may offer. Currently, there is a wide variety of inoculants based on different bacterial species, which play a key role in stimulating plant growth and reducing reliance on agrochemicals. Among emerging technologies, noteworthy examples include molecular inoculants (still not widely adopted commercially), bacterial and fungal consortia formulated into a single product, and inoculants containing genetically edited microorganisms-all of which have shown great promise in enhancing the performance of beneficial microbial species. The selection and genetic editing of rhizosphere-associated PGPB-an essential component of the plant microbiome-are viable alternatives for promoting more sustainable agriculture. Thus, this review examines the main inoculant technologies aimed at obtaining efficient microorganisms capable of improving rhizosphere conditions and microbial community dynamics, representing a strategic opportunity for developing solutions that enhance soybean sustainability.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsGlycine maxAgricultureBacteriaCrops, AgriculturalSoil MicrobiologySymbiosisGlycine max L.InoculantsMicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID42159807
PMCPMC13190809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.