Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159804›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2026

Why patient organizations are important to improve care for people with Lynch syndrome.

Jurgen Seppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jurgen SeppenTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Meibergdreef 69, 1105BK, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.seppen@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-9919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving health care requires patient involvement. For people with Lynch syndrome, general and specific areas can be identified in which it is important for health care professionals to collaborate with patients to improve care. This collaboration is mutually beneficial; better care for the patients, reduction of work load and higher chance of funding of research proposals for health care professionals. Patient organizations are comprised of patients that are often more educated and motivated to participate in discussions and workshops. In addition, patient organizations have access to a network of patients that can provide a broad overview of the needs and requirements of this group. Thus, patient organizations are the partners of choice in the collaboration of health care providers and patients. In this commentary, I outline the areas in which physicians and patients should collaborate; Providing information, research and clinical trial design, and psychological care and peer support.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisPatient ParticipationCooperative BehaviorHumansLynch syndromePatient advocacyShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID42159804
PMCPMC13190412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.