ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Quality and educational value of youtube videos on inguinal hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimWith the increasing use of digital platforms in surgical education, YouTube has become a widely accessible resource for trainees. However, the absence of peer review raises concerns regarding the reliability and educational value of its content. This study aimed to evaluate the educational quality, reliability, and instructional value of inguinal hernia repair videos on YouTube using multiple validated scoring systems. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search was conducted on YouTube, and 50 videos meeting predefined inclusion criteria were analyzed. Videos were independently assessed by two blinded reviewers using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, Video Power Index (VPI), Laparoscopic Video Educational Guidelines and Scoring (LAP-VEGaS), DISCERN, and Health on the Net (HONcode) criteria. Videos were also categorized according to their source.
resultsOf the 50 videos, 42% were uploaded by individual users and 36% by academic or institutional sources. Most videos demonstrated laparoscopic or robotic procedures. Median scores indicated moderate educational quality (GQS 3, JAMA 3, LAP-VEGaS 11). Videos categorized as originating from academic or institutional sources tended to achieve higher scores; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution. No significant correlation was found between video popularity (VPI) and educational quality.
conclusionYouTube provides a widely accessible but variable educational resource for inguinal hernia surgery, with overall moderate quality even among selected videos. Video popularity alone does not reliably indicate educational value. Instead, viewers may benefit from prioritizing videos with structured step-by-step narration, clear visualization of key anatomical landmarks, transparent source identification, and inclusion of complication management. While YouTube may support learning as a supplementary tool, it may not adequately replace structured surgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42159796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.