Comparison of Masimo O3 and INVOS 7100 cerebral oxygenation during immediate neonatal transition.

Prathomwalee Sintupech, Amonrat Anantho, Kamonrat Songnok, Ratchada Kitsommart

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study

In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prathomwalee SintupechDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6831-9339

Amonrat AnanthoNursing Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5100-1278

Kamonrat SongnokNursing Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9309-1361

Ratchada KitsommartDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. ratchada.kit@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-9899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare CrSO

conclusionMasimo O3 and INVOS show similar temporal patterns but an oxygenation-dependent proportional bias. CrSO WHAT IS KNOWN: • Cerebral oxygenation during neonatal transition increases rapidly after birth and can be monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy. • Absolute values differ between devices, limiting comparability across NIRS systems. WHAT IS NEW: • This study provides a simultaneous head-to-head comparison of Masimo O3 and INVOS during immediate neonataltransition, demonstrating oxygenation-dependent proportional bias. • CrSO2 values are device-specific and and should not be directly translated between monitoring platforms.

Indexed as

BrainOximetryOxygenOxygen SaturationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredOxygenCerebral oxygenationINVOS 7100Masimo O3Near-infrared spectroscopyNeonatal transition

Identifiers

PMID42159790

DOI10.1007/s00431-026-07017-y

PMCPMC13190425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.