ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Mix and match in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: overview of current prostheses systems and potential combinations.
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMix and Match is considered a viable option for minimizing morbidity in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) this strategy remains comparatively new. This study provides an overview of currently available implant systems and the potential combinations of glenoid and humeral components. MATERIALS AND
methodsA review of commercially available shoulder arthroplasty systems was performed. Nineteen manufacturers were contacted and asked to provide detailed information on glenoid and humeral component sizes for their rTSA systems. The reported component sizes were compiled and analyzed for possible combinations.
resultsThirteen manufacturers (68%) consented to the publication of their component size data. Two manufacturers (11%) do not produce rTSA systems, and four (21%) did not respond to repeated inquiries. A total of 21 implant systems were reported, comprising 10 distinct implant sizes. Glenosphere and humeral inlay diameters ranged from 32 mm to 48 mm, with 36 mm being the most commonly available size (16 of 21 systems, 76%).
conclusionMix-and-match implantation in rTSA is likely employed more frequently than documented, yet remains poorly investigated. This study demonstrates that numerous systems can theoretically be combined during revision surgery, although the biomechanical implications are not yet understood. Early clinical reports appear promising. The potential advantages for patients undergoing this procedure include reduced operative time, less invasive surgery with lower risk of perioperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.