Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159716›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Nectin-4 immunohistochemistry distinguishes urothelial carcinoma in situ from reactive urothelium.

Anna Katrin Scherping, Glen Kristiansen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna Katrin ScherpingInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Glen KristiansenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. glen.kristiansen@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-5487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nectin-4 has been reported to be frequently overexpressed in urothelial carcinoma; however, its expression and diagnostic utility in urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) have not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we compared Nectin-4 expression in 50 cases of urothelial CIS and 50 cases of normal or reactive urothelium. Whole sections were immunohistochemically stained for Nectin-4, CK20 and p53, and staining results were evaluated using the H-score. Membranous Nectin-4 expression was significantly higher in urothelial CIS than in normal or reactive urothelium (p < 0.001) (24/50). A mutation type p53 immunohistochemical pattern was observed in 19/50 CIS cases (38%), while all benign urothelial samples displayed a wild-type pattern. Aberrant CK20 expression was present in 34/50 CIS cases (68%). The combination of CK20 and Nectin-4 detected 74% of CIS cases, exceeding the detection rate obtained with the commonly used CK20/p53 combination (62%) and the Nectin-4/p53 combination (68%). These findings indicate that Nectin-4 is frequently overexpressed in urothelial CIS and may serve as a useful adjunct immunohistochemical marker, particularly in combination with CK20, for the diagnosis of urothelial CIS.

Indexed as

BiomarkerImmunohistochemistryNectin-4Urothelial carcinoma in situ

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.