ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Development of the long COVID - 6 dimensions quality of life (LC-6D-QoL) scale: a Delphi study.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong COVID significantly impairs quality of life through multi-systemic complexity, including fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and dysautonomia. Existing generic tools fail to capture these manifestations, limiting patient-centered assessment. To address this gap, this study proposed a patient-focused, 16-item scale developed and content-refined through expert consensus, to evaluate quality of life in people with Long COVID.
methodsA two-round Delphi study involved two rounds of questionnaires and feedback. 37 experts with clinical or research experience in Long COVID participated in the first round, and 26 completed the second. In the first round, experts rated the relevance of proposed indicators. The second questionnaire incorporated modifications based on the experts' comments. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and agreement measures, while qualitative comments were thematically coded.
resultsExperts reached substantial agreement, above 83%, on the dimensions covering the main aspects of quality of life. Based on participants' comments, the initial scale was modified, and a consensus between 80 and 92% was reached in all dimensions. The Delphi process resulted in a scale composed of 6 dimensions and 16 items, which include dysautonomia assessment and affective-sexual life impact, omitted in generic tools. The dimensions of the LC-6D-QoL Scale were: (1) general health; (2) physical health; (3) mental health; (4) daily functioning; (5) social relationships and support; and (6) economic and work-related aspects.
conclusionsThis study establishes an expert-informed foundation for future validation of the LC-6D-QoL Scale, integrating clinical and experiential knowledge to refine its preliminary structure. The LC-6D-QoL Scale is a patient-centered instrument capturing six key dimensions often missed in generic tools-such as dysautonomia, mental fatigue, and work-related impact-to better assess quality of life in Long COVID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.