ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
A microfluidic lung cancer-vascular tumor-on-a-chip model for precise evaluation of anti-invasion therapeutics.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the single leading cause of cancer-related incidence and mortality worldwide, with approximately 90% of all cancer-related deaths due to tumor invasion and metastasis. However, traditional in vitro and animal models are not able to accurately replicate the biologically complex tumor microenvironment; therefore, they limit the exact evaluation of anti-invasion therapies. In the present study, we designed, fabricated and characterized a lung cancer-vascular tumor-on-a-chip utilizing microfluidic technology following previous studies to replicate tumor growth, invasion and interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM). We discovered that tumor cell invasion into the ECM is profoundly related to cytoskeletal remodeling. We evaluated the drug-screening potential of this model by evaluating five clinically used anti-invasion agents: paclitaxel; cisplatin; irinotecan; oxaliplatin; and gemcitabine. We discovered that gemcitabine inhibited tumor growth, invasion of tumor cells, cytoskeletal remodeling and the ability to invade the ECM, while oxaliplatin principally inhibited invasion. In addition, we also found the model to be very effective for screening for active compounds derived from traditional Chinese medicine, as demonstrated by the natural compound rocaglamide (ROC-A) which inhibited the invasion of tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner at 50 nM. Taken together, our lung cancer-vascular tumor-on-a-chip provides a sound model for studying tumor invasion and demonstrates potential as a platform for precise evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.