ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Consensus statement on the management of metastatic colorectal cancer beyond the second-line therapy in Saudi Arabia.
Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe burden of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is considerable in Saudi Arabia, with an increased incidence rate and lower overall survival (OS) rate and characterized by earlier age of onset, more aggressive disease, and limited access to molecular diagnostics and advanced therapies in some regions. While international guidelines provide general management pathways, regional differences necessitate tailored recommendations for patients progressing beyond second-line treatment in Saudi Arabia.
methodsA three-step modified Delphi method was adopted to develop the expert consensus on the management of mCRC beyond second-line therapy in Saudi Arabia. Ten medical oncologists from leading national cancer centers participated in the process, which included literature review, two voting rounds, and a panel discussion.
resultsThe present consensus consisted of 56 statements reaching predefined agreement levels. The statements provided recommendations regarding the factors affecting treatment selection beyond second-line therapy, treatment sequencing in third and later lines of therapy, dosing modifications, management of toxicities, and the role of combination regimens in third and later lines. The consensus also underscores systemic disparities in drug access and the lack of real-world data or registries in Saudi Arabia.
conclusionThis consensus provides contextualized, evidence-based guidance to Saudi oncologists managing mCRC beyond second-line therapy. It emphasizes individualized treatment, toxicity control, and the need for national registries and biomarker research. The recommendations aim to improve consistency of care while acknowledging infrastructural and epidemiological challenges unique to the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.