Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159081›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026

Screening for Periodontitis Using Blood Biomarkers and Demographic Data: A Machine Learning Study.

Seongwon Choi, Daniel Oh, Rami Rashed, Rami Hemadeh, Yoon Jeong Kim, Udochukwu Oyoyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seongwon Choi
Daniel Oh
Rami Rashed
Rami Hemadeh
Yoon Jeong Kim
Udochukwu Oyoyo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeriodontitis is a common chronic disease associated with systemic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diagnosis typically relies on dental examinations and radiographs, which may be underutilised by individuals who avoid, delay, or lack dental care. This study evaluated the potential of routine blood biomarkers and demographic data for screening moderate-to-severe periodontitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2012 adults aged ≥ 30 years (N = 3,338). Periodontal status was classified using CDC/AAP definitions. An XGBoost classifier was trained on 77 features spanning demographics, complete blood count, glycemic and hemo-globin markers, heavy metals, and additional biochemical assays. Model performance was assessed with Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.

resultsThe model achieved 61.1% Accuracy, 57.4% Precision, 94.6% Recall, and an F1 score of 71.5%. Performance was higher in males (F1 = 78.2) than in females (F1 = 63.9%). SHAP identified age, gender, blood cadmium, blood lead, and glycohaemoglobin (HbA1c) as top predictors.

conclusionRoutine blood biomarkers and demographics can be leveraged for non-dental screening of periodontitis, offering a feasible preventive strategy in primary care. The model achieved high recall, minimising false negatives, and identified biologically plausible predictors. This approach may help flag at-risk individuals, particularly in underserved populations, and support integration of oral health into general medical care.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningMass ScreeningPeriodontitisAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysBiomarkersblood biomarkersmachine learningNHANESperiodontitispreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID42159081
PMCPMC13188171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.