Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159068›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Nitrogen-Based Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Cancer in Women Aged 50 Years and Older: A National Data Linkage Study.

Karen M Tuesley, Fiona Caristo, Katrina Spilsbury, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Peter Donovan, Michael D Coory, Christopher B Steer, Susan J Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen M TuesleySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Medicine & Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-5085
Fiona CaristoSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Medicine & Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Katrina SpilsburyInstitute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia.
Sallie-Anne PearsonSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Peter DonovanClinical Pharmacology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael D CooryMater Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Christopher B SteerBorder Medical Oncology, Albury-Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, Australia.
Susan J JordanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Medicine & Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1121151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are used widely to treat osteoporosis and to manage bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Some studies suggest that nitrogen-based bisphosphonates (NBBs) may also reduce cancer risk more broadly, although evidence is inconsistent. Using linked administrative health data from Australian women aged > 50 years, we conducted nested case-control studies and used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between use of bisphosphonates (nitrogen-based and other) and other medicines approved for treatment of low bone mineral density, and risk of breast, colorectal, lung, uterus, thyroid, pancreas, kidney, cervical, stomach, liver, brain, bladder and gallbladder cancers and melanoma. In total, 243,629 incident cancer cases were matched to 1,218,075 controls. Compared to no use of osteoporosis medicines, use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates (NBBs) was associated with reductions in breast (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.87), uterine (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.66) and cervical cancer risk (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.97) with the greatest reduction in risk observed for women who used NBBs for over 5 years. However, NBBs were also associated with increased risk of lung (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.21) and liver cancers (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29), although there was no clear dose response. Raloxifene was also associated with lower risk of breast, colorectal, uterine and cervical cancer. Our exploratory study suggests links between some osteoporosis medicines and cancers related to reproductive hormones. Our results require confirmation but may provide new insights for cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesNeoplasmsNitrogenAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk FactorsBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesNitrogenbisphosphonatesbreast cancercancernested case–controlnitrogen‐based bisphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID42159068
PMCPMC13432198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.