ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Thymidine kinase as a biomarker of chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer using the KELIM model.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with platinum sensitivity being a key determinant of treatment outcomes. The KELIM model, derived from CA-125 kinetics, is a promising biomarker for predicting chemosensitivity. Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), a proliferation marker, has shown relevance in various cancers but its role in chemotherapy response for OC is unclear. Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed the association between TK1 protein (TK1p) and enzymatic activity (TK1a) and chemosensitivity (KELIM), platinum-free interval (PFI), and chemotherapy response score (CRS) in 28 patients with epithelial OC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomarker dynamics were measured at multiple timepoints. KELIM was calculated using CA-125 kinetics; relationships with CRS and PFI were evaluated. Results: KELIM demonstrated robust predictive performance (correlating with favorable CRS [rho = 0.731, p = 0.011] and longer PFI [rho = 0.437, p = 0.007]). TK1p and TK1a showed no significant correlations with KELIM, PFI, or CRS. ROC analysis for preoperative TK1p yielded an AUC of 0.6941, indicating moderate discriminative potential. TK1a increased postoperatively but lacked predictive value for chemoresistance. Conclusion: Our findings reinforce the value of KELIM as a reliable predictor of platinum sensitivity in OC. TK1 dynamics reflect tumor proliferation but did not significantly predict chemotherapy response. Larger cohorts and further research are required to explore whether TK1 can complement established biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.