ArticleDigital discovery2026
Identification of drug candidates against glioblastoma with machine learning and high-throughput screening of heterogeneous cellular models.
Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumour that presents significant treatment challenges due to its complex pathology and heterogeneity. The lack of validated molecular targets is a major obstacle for discovering new therapeutic candidates, with no new effective GBM therapies delivered to patients in over two decades. Here, we report the identification of compounds that target the GBM stem cell survival phenotype. Our approach employs machine learning (ML) predictors of cell survival trained on high-throughput, image-based, phenotypic screening data for 3561 compounds, at multiple concentrations, across a panel of six heterogeneous, patient-derived, GBM stem cell lines. We computationally screened more than 12 000 compounds spanning various chemical classes. Experimental validation of ML-identified candidates across the GBM stem cell lines led to the identification of three compounds with activity against the GBM phenotype. Notably, one of our validated hits, the HSP90 inhibitor XL-888, displayed targeted elimination of all six GBM stem cell lines with IC
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.