Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158901›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2026

Multicenter Validation of an AI-Based Snoring Model vs. Wearables for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea.

Haoyan Guan, Junyu Huang, Danling Liu, Long Yang, Hao Zeng, Jingjing Huang, Beiping Miao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haoyan GuanDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen (the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-2585-9745
Junyu HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Danling LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen (the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Long YangState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hao ZengDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen (the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing HuangSleep Medicine Center, ENT Institute and Otorhinolaryngology Department, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9237-6595
Beiping MiaoDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen (the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has high prevalence and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular comorbidities. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but limited by complexity, cost, and accessibility; smart wearables are convenient but less accurate. This study validated an AI-based snoring-sound model and compared its diagnostic performance with a wearable, using PSG as reference. Methods: Adults with suspected SAHS (n = 134) were included and underwent overnight PSG, with simultaneous snoring sound and wearable signal recording. The snoring algorithm used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms and a multiscale encoder-attention-decoder neural network for classification. Model performance was assessed using correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were computed for both models. Results: Disease severity was associated with variation in BMI (p < 0.001) and decreasing oxygen saturation (p < 0.001). The snoring model showed stronger correlation and higher agreement with PSG-derived AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753) than the wearable (r = 0.68). Although the snoring model yielded consistently higher AUCs, particularly in mild SAHS (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07), the differences between methods were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Both models achieved excellent discriminative performance in severe SAHS (AUC ≥ 0.90). Conclusion: The AI-driven snoring-sound model demonstrated comparable overall performance and numerically better performance in certain settings, particularly in identifying mild SAHS.

Indexed as

machine learningsensitivity and specificitysleep apnea syndromessnoring

Identifiers

PMID42158901
PMCPMC13182835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.