ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2026
Do NEUT-RI, NEUT-GI, RE-LYMP, and AS-LYMP provide diagnostic value in differentiating acute cholecystitis from biliary colic?
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the differential diagnosis of biliary colic and acute cholecystitis, physical examination, non-specific biochemical tests, and imaging methods are used. The aim of this study was to investigate the differential diagnostic power of NEUT-RI, NEUT-GI, RE-LYMP, and AS-LYMP parameters, which show neutrophil and lymphocyte activation, and are obtained with fluorescence flow cytometry during full blood count.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, patients presenting with right upper quadrant pain were separated into two groups according to the diagnoses of acute cholecystitis and biliary colic. The conventional inflammatory markers and the NEUT-RI, NEUT-GI, RE-LYMP, and AS-LYMP values were compared. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve analysis was performed to investigate the diagnostic power of the inflammatory markers.
resultsIn the acute cholecystitis group, C-reactive protein, white blood cells, neutrophil, monocyte, and immature granulocyte counts were higher, and the lymphocyte count was lower. The NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI values were significantly higher, and the RE-LYMP value was significantly lower in the acute cholecystitis group. The AS-LYMP values were similar in both groups. In the ROC analyses, the AUC values were 0.914 for CRP, 0.842 for WBC, 0.873 for neutrophils, and 0.823 for immature granulocyte count. A poor diagnostic performance was determined for NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI with AUC values of 0.662 and 0.612, respectively. The AUC for RE-LYMP and lymphocyte count was non-significant at <0.6.
conclusionThe results showed that NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI have limited diagnostic power in the differential diagnosis of acute cholecystitis from biliary colic, and RE-LYMP and AS-LYMP are insufficient diagnostically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.