SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for dry eye syndrome in Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stem cell therapy holds considerable potential for treating dry eye syndrome, though it has yet to receive clinical approval. Aim: This paper systematically quantifies the efficacy and safety of stem cell-based therapies in dry eye syndrome caused by Sjögren's syndrome, aiming to provide information for dry eye treatment efforts. Methods: This systematic review collected literature published prior to 16 January 2026 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library concerning stem cell therapy for Sjögren's syndrome-induced dry eye disease. Efficacy outcomes comprised: OSDI scores, along with changes in NIKBUT first, Oxford score, and Schirmer test results. Safety outcomes comprised commonly reported adverse events. Continuous outcomes were expressed as mean difference (MD), while dichotomous outcomes used single-group rates, both presented with 95% CI. All data analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: This meta-analysis included five studies involving 114 patients with dry eye syndrome. Results demonstrated that stem cell therapy significantly altered the OSDI score compared to pre-treatment levels: -15.10 (95% CI: -18.65, -11.56; P < 0.00001). NIKBUT first scores increased significantly by 3.26 points post-treatment (95% CI: 2.17, 4.34; P < 0.00001). The Oxford score showed a change of -0.20 (95% CI: -0.85, 0.45; P = 0.55) post-treatment. The Schirmer test score exhibited an overall change of 3.87 (95% CI: 1.93, 5.81; P < 0.0001). Specifically, the MD at 2 weeks, 4 months, and 12 months was 8.76 (95% CI: 0.58, 16.94; P < 0.04), 3.52 (95% CI: 1.66, 5.38; P < 0.002), and 5.10 (95% CI: 0.24, 9.96; P < 0.04), respectively. The incidence of injection pain at 4 weeks was 14% (95% CI: -11%, 39%, P = 0.28). Ocular discomfort occurred in 16% of subjects at 4 weeks (95% CI: -4%, 35%, P = 0.11). Periorbital oedema occurred in 14% of subjects at 4 weeks (95% CI: -11%, 39%, P = 0.28). Blurred vision and periorbital paresthesia occurred at treatment with rates of 21% (95% CI: -7%, 50%, P = 0.14) and 15% (95% CI: -4%, 35%, P = 0.12), respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that stem cell therapy effectively reduces OSDI scores, increase Schirmer test scores, and enhances tear film stability in dry eye syndrome caused by Sjögren's syndrome. However, the increased incidence of adverse events in the short term suggests that benefits and risks must be carefully weighed prior to clinical application, with rigorous monitoring and close follow-up required throughout treatment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261287054, identifier CRD420261287054.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.