Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158837›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026

Multiphase CT-derived markers for the characterization of large solid and cystic renal masses by histology and grade.

Yulian Mytsyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yulian MytsykVoxel Medical Diagnostic Center, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (MCECT) for differentiating benign and malignant renal masses > 4 cm, and in predicting renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and grade, using signal intensity (SI) and tumor-to-cortex signal intensity ratio (TCSI). Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 190 patients with renal tumors > 4 cm (120 solid and 70 cystic lesions). All solid tumors and 49 cystic lesions (Bosniak IIF-IV) underwent histopathological verification. MCECT was performed in four phases: pre-contrast, corticomedullary (CMP), nephrographic (NP), and excretory (EP). SI and TCSI were measured and analyzed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Cluster and principal component analyses were applied to evaluate enhancement-based classification. Results: For solid masses, excretory phase SI reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.844 for distinguishing RCC from other tumors (98.8% sensitivity, 69.4% specificity). Differentiating RCC from benign tumors using EP SI achieved an AUC of 0.745. CMP SI enabled separation of RCC subtypes, especially chRCC vs. pRCC (AUC = 0.983). SI of NP differentiated low- from high-grade ccRCC with an AUC of 0.969 (100% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity). Among Bosniak IIF cysts, EP TCSI ≥ 0.40 identified malignancy with 88.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC = 0.951). Cluster analysis grouped tumors by vascularity-based enhancement. Lymph node assessment showed no significant SI differences between pN1 and pN0. Conclusions: SI and TCSI from MCECT are accurate, non-invasive markers for histologic and biologic characterization of large renal masses. CMP and EP provide the highest diagnostic value. These enhancement parameters may improve radiologic workflows and support clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

cystic renal cell carcinomaimaging markerlarge renal massesmultiphase contrast-enhanced CTradiomicsrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42158837
PMCPMC13182699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.