Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158833›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026

Quantitative myocardial hypoperfusion on coronary CTA: correlation with left atrial and left ventricular functional parameters.

Safiye Sanem Dereli Bulut, Sevde Nur Emir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Safiye Sanem Dereli BulutDepartment of Radiology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sevde Nur EmirDepartment of Radiology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between myocardial hypodensity on standard coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and echocardiographic diastolic dysfunction (DD) grade, and to evaluate correlations between hypodensity percentage and CT-derived left atrium (LA) and left ventricular (LV) functional parameters. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients (mean age 47.9 ± 11.4 years, 86 men) who underwent CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease and had comprehensive echocardiographic data. Myocardial hypodensity was quantified as the percentage of LV myocardium with attenuation < 46 HU using semi-automated, patient-specific attenuation mapping. Left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) and volumes were derived from multiphase CCTA reconstructions, and echocardiographic diastolic dysfunction was classified as per American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) 2016 guidelines. Coronary artery disease (CAD) severity (CAD-RADS 2.0) and cardiovascular risk (SMART score) were also recorded. Correlation, ROC, and multivariate regression analyses were performed; a data-driven LAEF threshold was used to stratify impaired atrial function. Results: Hypodensity percentage correlated inversely with LAEF ( Conclusions: Quantitative myocardial hypodensity on CCTA correlates with subclinical diastolic dysfunction and LA functional impairment. These findings support the potential of incorporating perfusion metrics into routine CCTA workflows to improve early diastolic assessment.

Indexed as

cardiac imagingcoronary CT angiographydiastolic dysfunctionleft atrial functionleft ventricular ejection fractionmyocardial hypoperfusion

Identifiers

PMID42158833
PMCPMC13182695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.