ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026
Factors associated with false-negative Kaiser score results in breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the Kaiser score (KS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients diagnosed with breast cancer and to identify clinical, pathological, and radiological factors associated with false-negative Kaiser score. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 120 histopathologically proven breast cancer masses. Non-mass enhancements were excluded. The KS of each lesion was determined based on MRI features. Clinicopathological features and imaging findings were also analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with false-negative KS results in breast cancer diagnosis. Results: One hundred eleven (92%) of the cases had a KS of 5 or higher, yielding a true-positive result. Nine (8%) had a score below 5, yielding a false-negative result. In univariate regression analysis, a history of breast cancer ( Conclusions: The Kaiser score carries a risk of false-negative KS, especially in small tumors. Therefore, evaluation in conjunction with clinical risk factors, histopathological features, and additional imaging parameters is recommended. Furthermore, KS is a valuable decision-support tool in breast MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.