ArticleJournal of motor learning and development2026
Beyond Boundaries: Data Sharing in Motor Development Research-Best Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Article in Journal of motor learning and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data sharing is increasingly recognized as a critical practice in scientific research, facilitating transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration. In motor development research, the exchange of data holds particular potential for advancing knowledge and improving methodologies, especially because data collection in motor development research is resource intensive and costly, often requiring specialized equipment, standardized protocols, and longitudinal tracking. However, high data protection requirements, due to the personal nature of the data, pose significant challenges to data sharing. Many motor performance assessments involve children and adolescents, making privacy concerns even more pronounced due to ethical considerations surrounding vulnerable populations. The fragmentation of data sets, the variety of assessment tools, and inconsistencies in data collection methods further complicate large-scale data sharing in motor development research. Addressing these challenges requires the implementation of structured data-sharing frameworks, the development of technical infrastructures, and a shift toward standardized protocols. This research note outlines best practices for data sharing, highlights two prominent projects-MO|RE data (MOtor REsearch data repository) and the COMBINE Project (The Consortium for Motor Behavior in Neurodivergence)-and discusses key challenges and opportunities. The note concludes with implications for researchers aiming to implement data-sharing practices effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.