ReviewCureus2026
Heat-Related Illness and Heatstroke: A Narrative and Clinical Review for Emergency Clinicians.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat-related illness is a spectrum of conditions that can have a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of heat-related illness, particularly heatstroke, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department based on current evidence. Heatstroke represents the most severe form of heat-related illness and is characterized by core temperature above 40°C with central nervous system dysfunction. Both classic and exertional forms share similar pathophysiology driven by thermoregulatory failure, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan injury. Emergency department management centers on rapid recognition and immediate cooling, as outcomes correlate with duration and magnitude of hyperthermia. Cold-water immersion remains the gold standard for rapid cooling; however, evaporative and conductive methods such as ice sheets, tepid water misting with fanning, and administration of chilled IV fluids are effective alternatives when immersion is impractical. Continuous core temperature monitoring is essential to avoid overcooling, with a target of 39°C. Sedation should be achieved chemically rather than through physical restraint to prevent further heat generation, and vasopressors should be avoided unless hypotension persists despite aggressive cooling and volume resuscitation. Diagnostic testing should not delay cooling, though evaluation for multiorgan dysfunction and mimics such as sepsis or toxicologic causes is critical. In conclusion, an understanding of heat-related illness and heatstroke can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.