ArticleCureus2026
Closing the Loop After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Results: Barriers to Colonoscopy Completion Within the Saudi Model of Care in Qassim Health Cluster.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim In the Qassim Region of Saudi Arabia, a significant proportion of patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) do not proceed to diagnostic colonoscopy, compromising colorectal cancer (CRC) screening efforts. The specific reasons behind this drop-off remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the multidimensional barriers, including knowledge gaps, psychosocial factors, and sociodemographic traits, that prevent patients from undergoing follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FIT. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and October 2024 among 212 nonadherent patients in the Qassim Region. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were utilized to evaluate barriers, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify sociodemographic predictors of psychological barriers. Results The cohort was predominantly male (160; 75.47%), with a university-level education (104; 49.06%). A significant knowledge gap regarding colonoscopy was identified. The most frequently reported barriers were embarrassment (65; 30.95%), fear of a cancer diagnosis (43; 20.48%), and the misconception of not needing the test due to being asymptomatic (32; 15.24%). Multivariable regression indicated that higher educational attainment showed a trend toward a lower likelihood of reporting psychological barriers (OR: 0.56, p = 0.078). Additionally, gender was significantly associated with reporting family history (p = 0.004) and perceiving screening as important (p = 0.048). Conclusions Nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FIT in the Qassim region is primarily driven by psychosocial stigma (embarrassment and fear) and procedural knowledge deficits. These barriers can be minimized through targeted continuous patient education and culturally sensitive psychological support, which are essential to bridging gaps in the CRC screening cascade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.