Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158785›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Stump Appendicitis: A 25-Year Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management (2000-2025).

Anupam Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anupam GuptaSurgery, Bangalore Medical College, Bangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, and appendectomy remains the standard treatment. However, residual appendiceal tissue may persist after surgery and subsequently become inflamed, resulting in stump appendicitis, a rare but clinically significant condition. This review summarizes the current literature on stump appendicitis from 2000 to 2025, focusing on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was performed, and relevant English-language studies were analyzed. Reported cases span a wide age range, with variable intervals between index appendectomy and presentation. Most patients present with RLQ pain and imaging findings consistent with appendiceal inflammation, although diagnosis is often delayed due to low clinical suspicion. Computed tomography remains the diagnostic modality of choice. Management is typically completion appendectomy; however, selected uncomplicated cases may be initially managed conservatively with antibiotics, with or without interval surgery. Complicated cases may require percutaneous drainage or more extensive resection. Stump appendicitis remains under-recognized, and greater awareness, standardized reporting, and prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and guide management.

Indexed as

completion appendectomylaparoscopic appendectomyrecurrent appendicitisresidual appendiceal stumpstump appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID42158785
PMCPMC13182982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.