ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
Interdental brushes for improving oral hygiene in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An interdental brush (IDB) is an adjunctive oral-hygiene tool designed to clean interproximal spaces and remove dental plaque. This study systematically evaluated its effectiveness for improving oral hygiene and periodontal health among orthodontic patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across five databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus up to 30 August 2025. Randomized controlled trials enrolling orthodontic patients that compared IDB with other adjunctive oral-hygiene aids or with no adjunctive were included. The primary endpoint was periodontal condition, measured by periodontal indices. We assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Given clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively following SWiM guidance. The certainty of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Results: Six studies with a total of 442 orthodontic patients were included in the systematic review. Low-certainty evidence from individual studies suggested that IDB may reduce plaque and gingival inflammation compared with toothbrushing alone or floss. Greater benefits were observed when IDBs were combined with orthodontic toothbrushes, whereas no consistent advantage was demonstrated over monotufted brushes or oral irrigators. Outcome measures and indices varied substantially across trials, follow-up periods were generally short, and safety outcomes were rarely reported. These limitations restricted the ability to pool results and lowered the certainty of evidence. Conclusion: Low-certainty evidence from a limited number of heterogeneous trials provides only tentative indications that interdental brushes may help improve gingival health and plaque control in orthodontic patients-particularly when used with orthodontic toothbrushes. High-quality, multicenter trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are needed to guide clinical recommendations. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251136657, identifier CRD420251136657.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.