ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Association between normalized
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 262 consecutive children with MPP were enrolled from January to December 2023 at Fujian Children's Hospital. Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively reviewed. Normalized MP sequence reads were derived from pre-antibiotic oropharyngeal swabs and processed using a standardized fastp/Bowtie2 bioinformatics pipeline. Severe MPP (SMPP) was defined according to the 2019 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of CAP in Children. Associations between MP reads and disease severity were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, fever duration, coinfection, and A2063G mutation status. Model discrimination, calibration, and incremental value were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, bootstrap validation, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among 262 children (median age 6.3 years; 55.3% male), 131 were classified as SMPP and 131 as general MPP (GMPP). Compared with GMPP, SMPP patients had longer hospital stays and fever duration, higher rates of oxygen therapy, glucocorticoids, and second-line antibiotics (all P<0.05), as well as elevated inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer (DDi), ferritin; all P<0.05]. Normalized MP sequence reads were significantly higher in children with SMPP. After multivariable adjustment, children in the highest quartile (Q4) had a 2.69-fold increased risk of SMPP compared with those in the lowest quartile (Q1). As a standalone predictor, MP reads demonstrated modest discrimination (AUC =0.592). The clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.710, which increased to 0.723 after incorporation of MP reads (DeLong, P=0.40). Despite the modest improvement in AUC, reclassification metrics showed significant improvement (IDI =0.015, P=0.01; continuous NRI did not reach statistical significance), and DCA demonstrated greater net clinical benefit for the full model across a broad range of threshold probabilities. The full model showed good calibration and stability in bootstrap validation. Conclusions: Normalized MP sequence reads are independently associated with disease severity and systemic inflammatory burden in pediatric MPP. Although their standalone discriminatory capacity is limited, incorporation into a clinical model provides meaningful incremental predictive value and potential utility for early SMPP risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.