ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Early postnatal risk stratification for severe adverse outcomes in twin neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: development and temporal validation of an interpretable machine learning model.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Twin neonates face disproportionately higher risks of severe composite adverse outcomes, such as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), compared to singletons. However, specific predictive tools for this vulnerable population are lacking, as existing scoring systems often fail to account for twin-specific physiological dynamics. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for early risk stratification of adverse outcomes in twin neonates. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included twin neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Shanxi Children's Hospital. A derivation cohort (n=912; July 2022-June 2023) was used for model development, and a temporally separated cohort (n=592; July-December 2023) for temporal validation. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation. We developed and compared ML prediction models, evaluating discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to provide clinician-facing global and patient-level explanations of risk estimates. Results: After comparing four feature selection strategies, the 10-feature subset identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was utilized for model development. In temporal validation, random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB) models showed comparable discrimination [area under the curve (AUC): 0.851 Conclusions: We developed and temporally validated an interpretable GB-based ML model using routinely available NICU variables to support early risk stratification for severe adverse outcomes in twin neonates. Combined with a web-based risk calculator and SHAP-based interpretability, this model may assist NICU clinicians in identifying higher-risk twin neonates and prioritizing closer monitoring or early intervention. Multicenter external validation is warranted before broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.