ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
CT-based radiomics nomogram for distinguishing
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A total of 387 lesions of 325 children with pneumonia were retrospectively analyzed, including 162 MPP and 225 other pneumonias. The radiomic features were extracted from volume of interest (VOI) manually delineated on CT. Through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with five-fold cross-validation, optimum radiomic features were screened out. Radiomics signature was calculated through the linear combinations of the screened features. A clinical model was established with clinical independent risk factors selected by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A radiomics nomogram combining Rad-score and clinical independent risk factors was developed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve were employed to evaluate the performance of the radiomics nomogram. Results: Fourteen radiomic features were selected to calculate the Rad-score. White blood cell (WBC) count and lymphocyte count were independent clinical risk factors. The radiomics nomogram showed good discrimination for the type of pneumonia in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.874 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.836-0.908] and in the testing set with an AUC of 0.841 (95% CI: 0.771-0.893). The DCA and calibration curve demonstrated that the radiomics nomogram had excellent consistency and clinical practicability. Conclusions: The CT-based radiomics nomogram had good performance in distinguishing MPP from other pneumonias in children with CAP, which can serve as a reference for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.