Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158629›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of yoga

Effects of Pranayama on Recently Diagnosed Migraine: A Detailed Study Incorporating Cardiac Autonomic Functions and Clinical Scores.

Shubh Laxmi, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli, Pravati Pal, Rajeswari Aghoram, Nivedita Nanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of yoga. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shubh LaxmiDepartment of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Dhanalakshmi YerrabelliDepartment of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Pravati PalDepartment of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Rajeswari AghoramDepartment of Neurology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Nivedita NandaDepartment of Biochemistry, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context and Aims: Migraine is considered to be a primary headache disorder manifested by frequent on-and-off attacks of moderate to intense pain, mostly pulsatile or throbbing in nature. While various treatment options exist, including medication, non pharmacological interventions are also being explored to alleviate symptoms and improve overall well-being. By exploring the impact of Pranayama on multiple domains, this study aimed to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of this nonpharmacological intervention and its role in improving the well-being of individuals affected by migraine. Subjects and Methods: Recently diagnosed migraine patients were assigned into two groups, namely the control group ( Results: Cardiac autonomic functions as well as clinical scores were improved in both the groups, and this was significant in the yoga group. Vagal tone was significantly improved in the yoga group as compared to the control group. Conclusion: In light of the findings from this randomized controlled trial, it is evident that a 12-week Pranayama practice holds immense promise as a safe and accessible complementary intervention for individuals with recently diagnosed migraine under stable therapy. Pranayama, with its positive therapeutic impact on multiple aspects of migraine pathology and its noninvasive nature, holds great promise for individuals seeking alternative or complementary treatments for migraine.

Indexed as

Autonomic functionsHamilton Depression Rating Scaleheadache impact testmigraineMigraine Disability Assessment Scorepranayama

Identifiers

PMID42158629
PMCPMC13183280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.