Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of yoga

Enhancing Yoga Pose Recognition through a Multimodal Hybrid Approach with Attention Mechanism and Late Fusion on Yoga For All-30.

Jayasurya Marasani, Dhanvanth Reddy Yerramreddy, S Don

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of yoga. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jayasurya MarasaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Dhanvanth Reddy YerramreddyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.
S DonDepartment of Computer Science and Applications, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The project focuses on yoga pose recognition, a critical task in computer vision and AI, to enhance physical and mental well-being by improving posture analysis. It addresses challenges such as the lack of benchmark datasets and limitations in both landmark-augmented and landmark-free methods. Aims: 1. Developed a hybrid model combining landmark-based and landmark-free techniques for accurate yoga pose recognition 2. Introduced YFA-30, a comprehensive dataset with 30 yoga poses to benchmark pose recognition models 3. Conducted a comparative analysis of existing models with the proposed hybrid model. Settings and Design: The project operates within the domain of computer vision and artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on yoga pose recognition. It involves a controlled computational environment for training, validating, and testing deep learning models using datasets of yoga poses. The settings emphasize creating a system capable of real-time pose recognition and correction for practical applications in fitness, health, and education. Methods: • Hybrid Model: Combines MoveNet (landmark detection) and ResNet50 (image feature extraction) using a scaled dot-product attention mechanism and late fusion • Statistical Evaluation: Analyzes accuracy, loss, and performance metrics across multiple datasets (YFA-30, YFA-20, YFA-10, Kaggle, and Google CG) • Comparative Study: Benchmarks against models such as Mediapipe, YOLO-V8x, and Xception • Visualization: Uses Grad-CAM heatmaps for feature extraction insights. Material: Datasets: • YFA-30: Newly introduced dataset with 30 yoga poses with approximately 8000 images • Kaggle Dataset: Small dataset with 5 yoga poses • Google CG Dataset: Synthetic images of 5 yoga poses. Models: • Landmark-based: MoveNet, Mediapipe, and YOLO-V8x • Landmark-free: ResNet50, VGG16, EfficientNetB0, and Xception. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical analyses used in your yoga pose recognition project include: 1. Performance Metrics: Accuracy, loss (training, validation, and test), and loss curves across datasets (YFA-30, YFA-20, YFA-10, Kaggle, and Google CG) to evaluate model efficiency 2. Comparative Analysis: Benchmarking the hybrid model (MoveNet + ResNet50) against other models such as Mediapipe, YOLO-V8x-pose, and landmark-free models (e.g., VGG16 and Xception) 3. Cross-Validation: Testing on YFA dataset subsets to ensure robustness across data variability 4. Attention Mechanism: Scaled dot-product attention and late fusion to integrate and prioritize relevant features and landmarks 5. Visual Analysis: Heatmaps (Grad-CAM) to interpret keypoint detection and feature extraction 6. Dataset Testing: Evaluation on synthetic and real-world datasets to ensure adaptability. These analyses validate the hybrid model's performance and robustness.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceattention mechanismdeep learninglate fusionMoveNetResNet50yoga pose estimationyoga pose recognition

Identifiers

PMID42158625
PMCPMC13183277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.