ArticleBMJ public health2026
Prevalence, risk perception and motivations for waterpipe tobacco use among university students in Northern Nigeria: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: Waterpipe tobacco (hookah or shisha) and other alternative nicotine delivery methods are increasingly used by young adults. Understanding their prevalence, risk perceptions, motivations and predictors is essential for developing effective public health responses, especially in university settings. We determined the prevalence, risk perception, motivations and predictors of shisha use among university students in Nigeria. Methods: This is a cross-sectional mixed-methods study. We collected quantitative data via self-administered questionnaires (n=431) and identified predictors using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Qualitative insights were obtained from in-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of participants (n=20) and analysed thematically. Results: Among 431 respondents, 83.1% (n=358) recognised that shisha contains harmful substances; however, 10.4% (n=45) believed water filtration removed toxins. Approximately 23.0% of respondents (n=99) perceived shisha as being less addictive than cigarettes. The prevalence of ever-use was 26.2% (n=113) and 13.7% (n=59) for current use. Shisha use was independently associated with cigarette smoking (adjusted OR (aOR)=10.42, 95% CI 6.43 to 16.35), male sex (aOR=3.76, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.89), perception of shisha as being less harmful (aOR=3.53, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.34), higher weekly allowances (≥₦20 000) (aOR=3.63, 95% CI 1.42 to 7.36), course major (agriculture/management, aOR=2.47, 95% CI 1.43 to 7.24) and state of origin (aOR=1.99, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.75). Qualitative themes identified peer influence, accessibility, stress relief, psychological factors, misinformation and societal acceptance as key drivers of use. Conclusions: Shisha smoking is prevalent among university students in Nigeria and influenced by a combination of behavioural, socioeconomic and regional factors. Our findings could inform the development of tailored interventions that reflect these sociocultural and contextual realities and guide national youth tobacco control strategies in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.