Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158518›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026

Coping strategies and depression among the geriatric population in an urban field practice area of a medical college in North India: A community-based cross-sectional study.

Shubham Vivekanand Chawale, Sanjeev Kumar Rasania, Manish Kumar Goel, Prerna Kukreti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shubham Vivekanand ChawaleDepartment of Community Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, India.
Sanjeev Kumar RasaniaDepartment of Community Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, India.
Manish Kumar GoelDepartment of Community Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, India.
Prerna KukretiDepartment of Psychiatry, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is a common but often overlooked mental health issue in the elderly, with coping mechanisms significantly influencing its intensity and course. Despite its importance, there is a scarcity of community-based studies exploring coping patterns among older adults in urban Indian settings. Aim: To examine the types of coping strategies employed by the geriatric population and their association with depression. Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study was carried out between November 2022 and February 2024 among 338 individuals aged 60 years and above residing in Urban Field Practice Area of a Medical College in North India. Depression levels were measured using the geriatric depression scale (GDS), while coping strategies were assessed using the stress coping behavior scale (SCBS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, applying relevant statistical tests. Results: Depressive symptoms were present in 51.2% of participants. Adaptive coping approaches-such as religious practices (mean score 3.83 ± 0.48) and acceptance (3.60 ± 0.67)-were more frequently reported among those without depression ( Conclusion: There is a clear link between the type of coping mechanism used and the presence of depression among the elderly. Encouraging positive coping methods and identifying harmful patterns early can aid in improving mental health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Coping strategiesdepressiongeriatric

Identifiers

PMID42158518
PMCPMC13183310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.