ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Does alleviating depression reduce loneliness? A longitudinal study.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Loneliness is a key factor affecting outcomes in depression, but its course and correlates during recovery remain understudied. Aim: To examine the prevalence, course, and psychosocial and clinical correlates of loneliness in patients with depression using a longitudinal design. Methods: In this naturalistic longitudinal study, 110 patients with current depressive episode were assessed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up using the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS), revised UCLA loneliness scale (RULS-6), Social Support Questionnaire, Social Connectedness Scale-Revised, Lubben Social Network Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, WHO quality of life scale- brief (WHOQOL-BREF), and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Univariate analyses examined associations between loneliness and clinical and psychosocial variables, followed by multivariate regression to identify independent predictors. Results: At baseline, 94.5% of participants reported significant loneliness, decreasing to 58.2% at follow-up. Depressive symptoms improved substantially, with 31.8% achieving remission; however, 45.7% of remitted individuals continued to report loneliness. Loneliness was significantly associated with greater depression severity, poorer social connectedness, lower social support, poorer sleep quality, poorer quality of life, and higher suicidality. In multivariate regression, depression severity did not independently predict loneliness. Lower social connectedness and poorer quality of life in the social relationships domain consistently predicted loneliness across assessments. Conclusion: Loneliness remains highly prevalent in depression and often persists despite symptomatic improvement. Findings suggest loneliness represents a partially distinct therapeutic target requiring focused psychosocial assessment and intervention in depressive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.