ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Barriers, Solutions, and Strategies.
Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Description The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into health care holds the potential to revolutionize patient care by enhancing clinical decision-making, improving diagnostic accuracy, and reducing costs. Despite this promise, adoption remains limited due to a range of technical, regulatory, educational, and cultural barriers. This paper examines these challenges and proposes strategies to support safe and effective implementation of AI in clinical practice. Key barriers include the lack of model interpretability, often referred to as the "black box" problem, which undermines clinician trust and accountability in clinical settings, evolving regulatory frameworks and unresolved questions surrounding liability, and persistent concerns regarding data quality, access, and privacy. In addition, bias in AI models remains a critical issue with implications for health equity. Beyond these established challenges, emerging barriers include a disconnect between academically developed models and real-world clinical development, as well as the need for substantial transformation in medical education to address AI assisted clinical workflows. The increasing use of AI in core clinical tasks, such as documentation and diagnostic support, also raises concerns regarding the potential erosion of fundamental clinical skills. Without deliberate training strategies, reliance on AI may compromise the development and maintenance of independent clinical reasoning. To address these challenges, this paper emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, transparent and interpretable model development, modernization of medical education, and the establishment of adaptive regulatory and ethical frameworks. Ultimately, the successful integration of AI in health care will depend on aligning technological innovation with clinical trust, education, and patient centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.