Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158475›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2026

Improving Scholarly Activity Through a Bundled Intervention of Resident-Faculty Connection and Research Ideas.

Katie Suleta, Norman W Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katie SuletaHCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education, Nashville, Tennessee.
Norman W GillHCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residents report barriers to engaging in scholarly activity despite this being a common requirement across residency programs. Two commonly reported barriers are a lack of mentorship by faculty and a lack of ideas for projects that meet the criteria for scholarly activity. The study objective is to describe the effect of an intervention to address a lack of mentorship and a lack of ideas for scholarly activities. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was utilized to investigate changes in scholarly activity between 2 academic years. An internal medicine residency program with 30 residents and 17 faculty members participated in an educational innovation in the 2022/2023 academic year. Residents in the previous academic year (n = 30) served as the comparison group. The faculty brainstormed ideas for new projects and provided sign-up sheets with quick response (QR) codes. First-year residents had to either sign up for a project or have their own protocol developed within 3 months of beginning residency. Results: The intervention group participated in more original research projects, presentations, and publications in PubMed indexed journals than the comparison group. The most notable increase was in presentations at regional and national conferences, which rose from 3 to 7. Participation in projects across other post-graduate year groups also increased. Conclusion: Faculty members brainstorming ideas, providing a hard deadline for first year residents, and the use of a QR code to recruit residents to existing research teams provided a cheap, easily implemented scholarly activity intervention. Other programs may benefit from adopting a similar program if possible.

Indexed as

ACGMEgraduate medical educationinternship and residencymedical scholarshipresearchscholarly activity

Identifiers

PMID42158475
PMCPMC13182947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.