ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2026
An Innovative Model for Graduate Medical Education Faculty Development Through Physician-in-Training Delivery.
Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Faculty development is a core requirement for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency programs. Successfully delivering content to faculty can be challenging. This pilot study aimed to assess expert-developed sessions delivered by resident physicians to faculty at the completion of their clinical rotations. Methods: A prospective cohort project was conducted, involving precepting faculty and resident physicians in a dermatology residency program. Each resident, at the end of their rotation, delivered a faculty development program to their attending physician. Each resident participated in the program for 1-3 years. The faculty development programs were based on faculty development programs developed by various academic centers, including HCA Healthcare, Mayo Clinic, and the University of Toronto. The primary endpoint of this project was faculty participation in the faculty development session. Secondary endpoints were participation status by faculty or residents' personal characteristics. Residents documented attendance and the topic of each presentation. This data was used to assess faculty participation, the number of presentations delivered, and the topics covered during faculty development sessions. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: Over 60 months, 8 dermatology residents delivered 86 presentations to 19 faculty members with 93.2% faculty participation. The topics covered included teaching during the COVID-19 era, faculty wellness, case-based collaborative learning, burnout, precepting, and depression. This initiative successfully recruited faculty members who had not previously participated in any faculty development programs. Conclusion: This model of resident physician-delivered faculty development content successfully addressed barriers in recruiting faculty for participation, which may have been facilitated through relationships formed during rotations, between the residents and attending physicians. Further research is recommended to validate the effectiveness of the model in diverse settings and explore its impact on faculty development outcomes and medical education quality. This model has the potential to improve participation in graduate medical education faculty development programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.