ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2026
Patterns of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Results From the iBRA-2 Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patterns of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Results From the iBRA-2 Cohort Study.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Long-term data indicate that postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is associated with improved overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) remains controversial in the context of planned PMRT, but rates of IBR are increasing. The aim of this study was to examine patterns of PMRT in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR. Methods: Data were collected from 2526 patients enrolled in the iBRA-2 prospective cohort study undergoing 2606 mastectomies with and without IBR between 1 July 2016 and 31 December 2016. Patients were recruited consecutively at 71 centres across the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland and at five international centres. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore associations between recommendation for PMRT and patient- and procedure-related factors. Results: Of 2590 breast procedures included in the analysis, 696 were implant-based, 105 pedicled-flap and 230 free-flap reconstructions, and 32.5% of implant-based, 34.3% of pedicled-flap and 35.7% of free-flap reconstructions were recommended for PMRT. PMRT recommendation by cancer stage was 21% for T1-2 N0, 65% for T1-2 N1 and 89% for T Conclusion: Although IBR was more likely to be performed for lower-stage cancers and in younger patients with fewer comorbidities, a third of patients undergoing IBR were recommended for PMRT. This adds to a growing body of evidence that IBR is becoming an acceptable option for women requiring PMRT. The study also highlighted regional variation in PMRT practice within the UK and Ireland, which merits further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.