ArticleInnovation in aging2026
When context matters: social disparities in preventable hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We examined geographic variation in the risk of potentially preventable hospitalization (PPH) among individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Research Design and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed a 20% random sample of 2017-2018 traditional Medicare claims ( Results: One-third of hospitalizations were PPHs. Urinary tract infection (33.8%), heart failure (25.7%), and pneumonia (18.6%) accounted for 78% of all PPHs. Unadjusted PPH rates were higher in highly disadvantaged areas (23.9%) compared to low-disadvantaged areas (20.6%). In the overall sample, Black and Hispanic individuals had higher odds of PPH than White individuals, as did those in highly disadvantaged areas compared to low-disadvantaged areas. Among highly disadvantaged urban and rural-or-micropolitan area residents, adjusted PPH rates were 23% and 27%, respectively. Odds of PPH were markedly higher in highly disadvantaged rural-or-micropolitan areas compared with low-disadvantaged areas. Racial/ethnic disparities diminished in these areas, while risk increased for female adults compared with male adults. Discussion and Implications: The highest PPH risk occurred in highly disadvantaged rural-or-micropolitan areas. Although racial/ethnic disparities were attenuated in these populations, the overall PPH risk was elevated. Policy efforts should prioritize expanding access to ambulatory care in disadvantaged areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.