ArticleWorld journal of pediatric surgery2026
Mid-term outcomes of valvuloplasty versus mechanical valve replacement for the common atrioventricular valve in single-ventricle pediatric patients.
Article in World journal of pediatric surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of mechanical valve replacement of the common atrioventricular valve (CAVV) in single-ventricle pediatric patients and compare this with valvuloplasty. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 91 single-ventricle pediatric patients who underwent CAVV surgery between 2014 and 2025. Patients were divided into two groups according to the initial surgery: valvuloplasty and mechanical valve replacement groups. Baseline and perioperative characteristics were compared between groups. Overall survival and freedom from reintervention were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the optimal cut-off values for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time in predicting in-hospital and late mortality. Results: There were 78 cases in valvuloplasty and 13 cases in the mechanical valve replacement group. The replacement group had significantly longer CPB and ACC time ( Conclusions: Mechanical valve replacement of the CAVV in single-ventricle pediatric patients provides satisfactory mid-term survival comparable to valvuloplasty, but with superior valve durability. Prolonged CPB time is associated with poorer survival and should be minimized whenever possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.