Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158444›Full record

ArticleAnthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi2025

Geographic and sex differences in the 3D configuration of the human parietal bone.

Yi Yan, Tea Jashashvili, Kristian J Carlson, Xiujie Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi YanInstitute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China.
Tea JashashviliDivision of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Kristian J CarlsonDivision of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Xiujie WuInstitute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a sizable component of the cranial vault, the parietal bone is essential for understanding the regional variation of cranial surface morphology. Predigital, traditional morphological studies have tended to underemphasize the role of parietal trait variation, particularly in identifying region-specific and/or sex-related differences in modern human populations. Consequently, the extent of morphological variation in the parietal bone among modern human populations remains insufficiently understood. In this study, we perform a three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometric analysis of the external surface of the parietal bone, using microcomputed tomography data from 120 human crania (60 males and 60 females) sampled from European and Chinese populations. The analysis of the periosteal surface of the parietal bone reveals significant sexual dimorphism in shape space. Specifically, the biparietal distance between pterion landmarks is wider in Chinese males than in Chinese females. Regional differences in parietal bone shape are more frequently statistically significant. Parietal bones of European populations tend to be wider and shorter, with less pronounced parietal eminences, whereas those from Chinese populations are relatively narrower and longer, exhibiting more prominent parietal eminences. When 3D geometric morphometric analysis is conducted in form space, which incorporates both shape and size, additional differences between sexes and populations become evident. Males exhibit significantly larger parietal bones than females, and individuals from European populations have significantly larger parietal bones than those from Chinese populations. Ultimately, differences in form space are more pronounced than those in shape space, emphasizing the importance of considering both shape and size in morphological analyses.

Indexed as

Chinacomputed tomographycranial vaultEuropegeometry

Identifiers

PMID42158444
PMCPMC13134057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.